The Incredible Awesomeness Of God’s Creation

Introduction

 
I was inspired to write this article as I sat outside in my back yard this summer just before sundown, and looked up and around at God’s magnificent creation all around me… the tall trees, the birds chirping, the blue sky, the green grass, and so much more. I heard the robins giving what I think is their warning call. I absolutely love robins… They are so gentle and so protective of their young. They constantly chirp a warning signal if anything or anyone gets too close to their nest.
 

The Tremendous Variety In God’s Design

 
As I thought about these things I wondered about just how MANY things, how many living creatures God has created. And bear in mind that these living creatures do not even take into account God’s creation of various inorganic “elements” in our world… metals, gasses, and other “inert” materials that God created.
 

More Design In Creation Than Mankind Can Even Account For

 
Do you know that even the greatest researchers and scientists don’t know how many different life-forms exist on planet earth. They don’t have a clue as evidenced by this quote from phys.org:
 

Current estimates for the number of species on Earth range between 5.3 million and 1 trillion. [1]

 
There are many species that they know have not even been discovered yet. What is ironic, is that the people that promote evolution can’t even agree with each other as to how many species there are from the various categories of species (plants, mammals, fish, etc) yet they claim to know for sure that all those species evolved from some gigantic explosion billion of years ago, an explosion that they can’t identify the source of and of materials in that explosion that they can’t identify with any degree of certainty either. Nor can they explain how an explosion can create order and design in the observable universe.
 

Let’s Look At Just ONE Design

 
Let’s see how much intelligent design went into just ONE of God’s creatures. Let’s look at the spider, like the one shown at the top of this article. Spiders are born knowing how to design a web. They are born with a built-in web-making machine – their silk supply. They are born with oily feet so they won’t stick to their own web. They are born with fangs. These fangs they are born with are connected to a supply of venom. They use those fangs to inject that venom into their victims to paralyze those victims and dissolve the tissues of those victims. All their limbs are designed to work in unison to allow the spider to have smooth movement in all directions. They know to jump or run if they are being attacked. Did you know that about 99% of all spiders have eight eyes. But some have six, four, two or none at all. Spiders with at least 4 eyes, have two types of eyes: a large pair of primary eyes that form images, and a secondary pair of eyes that enable spiders to track movements and gauge distances. If there is no Intelligent Designer, then where did spiders learn how to do so many things from birth and how could the evolutionary fairy tale of “random chance” explain the level of complexity seen in just this one creature, a bug? The answer of course is that God’s magnificent creative design is built-into these creatures and all living things.
 

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” Romans 18-20

Additional Information About God’s Amazing Creation:

1. How many species on Earth? A simple question that’s hard to answer
2. Abiogenesis: Can Life Come from Non-Living Chemicals?
3. The Origin of Life
4. Biological Evolution

— RM Kane
 

Why We Can Say That The Theory Of Evolution Is Promoted By Pseudo-Scientific Dummies

“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.” Psalm 14:1

The evolutionist hath said in his heart, There is no need for the Creator God of the Bible.

Introduction

 
This article explains how the theory of evolution is promoted by psuedo-scientists who prove they are dummies by all the evidence for Intelligent Design that they totally ignore, gloss over, sweep under the proverbial carpet or have no reasonable explanations for. I will briefly address those issues here. As you will see, it doesn’t take much investigating to realize that evolutionary theories are not based on solid observable evidence and in fact, the evidence is to the contrary. Evidence in nature supporting “intelligent design” is overwhelming. I hope this short article will help you to see some of the glaring problems with evolutionary theories of the origins of life.
 

Some Very Basic And Profound Problems With Evolutionary Theory

1. Logic and real-world evidence dictates that everything has a “first cause”, except of course, by definition, a supernatural eternal Creator. Evolutionists have no true, legitimate “first cause” in any of their “origins” models.

 

2. In our observable universe, non-living things cannot and do not turn into living things capable of reproducing themselves, yet this false assumption is a major “cornerstone” of evolutionary theory. To put it another way: The many “theories” of evolution can never, in good faith, get off the starting line.

 

3. It is dishonest to claim that evolution on our planet was “seeded” by creatures from another planet, as that is not an observable phenomenon. It is only wild speculation and a childish fairy tale of someone who lacks evidence. It is not “science” by any stretch of the definition. Also, it is a bizarre “head in the sand” way of trying to avoid dealing with the “first cause” problem and yet there are many evolutionists who subscribe to this goofy idea as if it was somehow “scientific”.

 

4. Living things do not evolve into creatures with more DNA (genetic instructions) than their parents. Just like you can’t get something from nothing, you can’t get more parts (i.e. more complexity) from less parts.

 

5. Variation that is designed into living creatures is NOT evolution even though many evolutionists want to believe that it is. It is simply “variation within species” as even evolutionary pseudo-scientists must admit when pressured into telling the truth.

 

6. The amount of intelligence built-into the tiny brains of living creatures like insects is mind-boggling… pun intended.

 

7. Rather than trying to explain any obvious examples of complex design in the natural world, evolutionists tend to focus on small variations and overly simplistic models that allow them to get away with deceiving their audiences.

 

8. Evolutionists use the fossil record as evidence for their theories, and yet fossils are only evidence of catastrophic death of creatures buried rapidly in mud, volcanic ash or sediment. There is NOTHING observable in the fossil record that allows for an honest conclusion that one fossil evolved or some how transitioned into yet another life form, including a more complex life form. There are even fossilized trees that span multiple layers of fossilized sediment, making it obvious that the tree fossils are the result of multiple layers of rapidly forming sediment, not the result of millions of years of evolution. If a person takes a look at the massive amounts of fossils world wide, you may actually have to admit (if you not a truth denier), that such massive catastrophic burying of living creatures is extremely compelling evidence for a world wide flood as mentioned in the biblical account of Noah and his ark.

 

9. The idea that the universe is the result of an explosion called the “Big Bang” is as silly as it gets. Explosions destroy order, they don’t create or increase order. In fact, it is a scientific LAW, the law of entropy, that declares that things in our universe tend towards DISORDER.

 

10. The theory that humans are here on earth because they evolved over millions of years from some sort of “primordial slime” is as insane as the Big Bang theory. I would sooner believe that a super-computer evolved out of a pile of rocks because the mathematical probably of the latter is far likelier than the former.

 

11. There are ZERO examples in the entire world of evolution occurring at this point in time. All we see are examples of EXTINCTION. How about that?

How Do Evolutionists Get Away With Their False “Science”?

• Evolutionists claim that extremely long periods of time are needed for living creatures to evolve. But no amount of TIME can add INFORMATION (i.e. new genetic material) to a creature’s DNA.

 

• Evolutionists use the term “random chance” as if it was some kind of causative factor that enables living things to evolve, when it is only a mathematical term for probability. And the probability for the vast amount of complex lifeforms on earth coming into existence by “random chance” over millions or billions of years is ZERO which is why we see ZERO examples of evolution occurring around us in the world today.

 

• The design that we can obviously see in the billions of living creatures throughout our world requires a Designer and in the next section we will see some very interesting – yet not at all uncommon – examples of design in the world around us.

Obvious Examples Of Intelligent Design In Nature

• Single-celled creatures such as amoebas could not have evolved into more complex creatures. They do not have the DNA instructions to make that happen.
• Creatures that reproduce by cell-division could not have evolved into male and female.
• Spiders could not have evolved. To survive they need to be born fully functional, knowing how to build webs, having the silk web making machinery and having oily feet that don’t stick to their own webs. Spiders don’t have teeth, so they have to liquefy their prey before they consume them. They use enzymes to break down a prey’s body into a liquid form, which is then sucked through the spider’s straw-like mouth into its stomach. And you want me to believe all that just evolved by… RANDOM CHANCE?
• Bees could not have evolved. They have too many complex co-dependent systems. They need to be able to find pollen, have the bodily equipment to gather pollen and the ability to process pollen into honey, make beeswax, build honeycombs, and MAKE ROYAL JELLY that turns a larva into a Queen. And bees need several types of bees (worker bees, drones & queens) in their colonies in order for those colonies to function and survive.
• Lightning bugs could not have evolved. What “survival of the fittest” rule would explain their glow material and their ability to turn their lights off and on at will?
• Butterflys and moths could not have evolved. How in the world can ANYTHING BUT Intelligent Design explain the transformation of a caterpillar into a flying insect that does so by building a cocoon and then liquifying itself and then totally reforming itself into an entirely new creature?
• Electric eels could not have evolved. They would have died off LONG before they could have evolved the ability to produce electric shocks for their protection and survival.
• The ultimate example of Intelligent Design in our world is human beings. Each human consists of multiple complex systems that all work together to allow humans to exist. Some of those systems include: circulatory system, nervous system, digestive system, skeletal system, reproductive system and immune system. Billions of years of evolution is not a reasonable explanation for that enormous level of complexity. TIME alone can create NOTHING. DNA mutations only cause negative results (hence the term “birth defects”) or minor modifications that provide no new design changes.

Summary

 
I could give many, many more examples of Intelligent Design in the world around us but it should be obvious by this point that evolution is a ridiculous idea, not even worthy of being called a scientific theory and it should have been put to rest the moment Charles Darwin first proposed the idea. I was taught evolution in public school and I simply believed it. The simplified arguments in favor of it made sense as long as you didn’t hear any arguments against it. This is what evolutionists depend on. I have since learned that evolution is simply part of the religion of secular humanism. For secular humanists, nature is an eternal, self-perpetuating force, simply because they want to believe that to be true, not because it is true. It takes MORE FAITH to believe in the theory of evolution than in Intelligent Design when presented with all the FACTS. — RM Kane
 

For More Information On The Theory Of Evolution And Intelligent Design:

• Evolution And Creation Science Resources At ComingInTheClouds.org
• Institute For Creation Research
• Creation Studies Institute
• Intelligent Design
• Creation Insights

A Very Brief Review Of Darwinism

The “Darwin” award is an award commonly given out to those poor souls who die due to some stupid act, oftentimes while the person is intoxicated.  It is an award meant to acknowledge or recognize extreme foolishness and to “award” the recipient for having died… and thus removing themselves from “the gene-pool”.  However, if not for the grace of God, we would all die in such ways. If anyone ever deserved the Darwin award, an award for extreme foolishness, it would be Charles Darwin himself, a man who made up stories regarding the origins of life on earth with nothing but speculation and imagination, but no real cold hard evidence. Even fossils – in that so-called “fossil record” – are only evidence of living things that died catastrophically, not evidence of changes in life forms. So the ultimate winner of the Darwin award for dying in a state of extreme foolishness is… Charles Darwin:

Thanks to the infiltration of the media and school systems by secular humanists and atheists, the majority of the world’s population that exits the doors of a public school on graduation day, are believers in the secular humanist religion of Darwinism, also known as “evolution”.  Oh, the “really educated” evolutionists will say they no longer agree precisely with Darwin’s original formula on evolution.  However the difference between them and him is miniscule. They still believe that “nothing” created everything or that space aliens planted life on earth but they have no explanation as to who created their space aliens.

“Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves.” [Psalm 100:3]

The Duplicating Dictionary Evolution Analogy

 
Every living organism on the planet earth has its own unique DNA code, a code that is a set of instructions for the replication of that organism. No matter how many times a living creature replicates or reproduces, its DNA code always contains:
 
1. the same amount of information (resulting in a healthy, undamaged offspring)
 
2. the same information with some information missing or damaged (resulting in unhealthy offspring).
 
We see this phenomenon very clearly in the real world when babies are born with severe defects as a result of radiation or chemical damage occurring to their DNA code during pregnancy. Even if a child is born with an abnormality that is not considered a severe defect, such as an extra finger, we cannot honestly state that such a mutation was evidence of evolution. First of all, the DNA code may have already contained the information needed for a 6th digit. Also, the extra digit will never be a claw or anything else that was never a component found in the original organism. “Parts is parts” and design is design. You can’t get something from nothing. You can’t get a part that was NEVER present in the original DNA code. If I buy a model airplane kit, it only has so many parts in it. I can assemble them any way I want, but I can’t ever expect the finished model to include parts that were not in the original model airplane box.
 

And now for the dictionary duplication analogy…

 
If I take a 1,000 page dictionary apart, page by page, and then proceed to make a million copies of that dictionary, page by page, I will never end up with any uniquely NEW pages that were never present in the original dictionary. Some pages might get damaged or lost (i.e. think birth defects) or duplicated (i.e. think “identical twins”) in the process, BUT no new dictionary information will ever appear at the end of the copying process. And so it goes with DNA and all living creatures. You may want to believe that the impossible is possible… that you can get more information from out of nowhere, in your attempt to try to build a case for evolution, but you are not being honest with yourself or honest with science or honest with observable data out in the real world. — RM Kane
 

The Endosymbiotic Theory Of Evolution

Yet Another Vain Attempt To Deny Intelligent Design

By Grasping At Straws To Try To Explain Away God And Scientific Creationism

 
Evolutionists continue to search for evidence of their ridiculous theories, looking under every rock possible, even when the evidence against their ever evolving theories is ever growing. One of their latest evolutionary theories is called the “endosymbiotic theory” of evolution. This latest theory claims that evidence exists for evolution in single celled organisms that have a symbiotic (i.e. interdependent) relationship with one another. However, a major flaw in their argument is an unfounded assumption that these symbiotic relationships DEVELOPED over time, rather than existed since the beginning of “creation”. The creationist (intelligent design) view is that these symbiotic relationships were DESIGNED INTO the organisms, versus magically appearing later on as these evolutionists want to believe.
 
Since evolutionists typically deny the possibility of a Creator and a corresponding Creation of that Creator, they have to MAKE ASSUMPTIONS, assumptions that SOMETHING HAPPENED, something changed, something mutated, something EVOLVED (meaning, the existence of the theory presupposes the truth of the theory). So… what is often referred to as proving the theory is really only an attempt to “justify” the theory in one particular case, with one particular organism or one particular set of organisms. We see that here in a quote from an article about this Endosymbiotic Theory:
 
“Other species, not being able to photosynthesis sugars or break them down through oxidative phosphorylation, decreased in abundance until they developed a novel adaptation of their own.” [1]
 
The problem with the Endosymbiotic Theory and with any theory of evolution is that there are NO evolutionary theories based upon changes or adaptations OBSERVED OVER TIME, simply because you would have had to observe the entire evolutionary process prior to (and up to) what is ONLY observable today. Also, any similarities between living organisms – like bacteria AND chloroplasts reacting similarly or identically to antibiotics – is to be expected, since God, the Programmer, used interrelated materials and designs in His creation of all living things. For example, all mammals have red blood with many similar or even identical components.
 
Part of the explanation of the endosymbiotic theory of evolution relies on EVOLUTION… so it is a theory of the evolution of a specific organism being based upon the ASSUMPTION that prior living things EVOLVED into the current organisms whose origins are being explained. That cannot be called science. Its simply speculation built upon other speculations.
 
Not only that, these evolutionary theories (or sub-theories) tend to VASTLY OVERSIMPLIFY the organisms they are trying to explain the evolution of – overlooking MOUNTAINS of highly complex design features that no amount of “random chance” could ever hope to produce… THERE ARE NO INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAKING LEAPS OF CHANGE (of the kind that evolutionists are trying to explain) ENCODED WITHIN THE DNA OF LIVING CREATURES… Living organisms cannot and do not replicate into anything additionally complex, containing addition genetic material … Therefore, the WHOLE CONCEPT of some mysterious “process” called evolution is based upon false premises, events that have NEVER been observed ANYWHERE on the entire planet, namely, some creature with such and such a DNA code reproducing into a creature with a more complex DNA code. So the entire field of evolutionary “science” is just dishonest. It’s fraud science or non-science or NONSENSE.
 
The whole purpose of DNA is to PREVENT evolution… by that I mean, to prevent things from going haywire, and to ENSURE that living organisms replicate PROPERLY into what God designed them to REPLICATE into, NOTHING different. And by the way, damage to DNA during the replication process is not evolution. In mammals it is called BIRTH DEFECTS. In plants it is called mutations, typically harmful, often preventing further replication/germination/fertility. Even if a mutation is beneficial, the mutation never results in MORE COMPLEX DNA. “Parts is parts” as they say. You can’t add 2 plus 2 and get 5, no matter how many different calculators you use. — RM Kane
 

Creationist Ken Ham Destroys Theory Of Evolution In Debate With Bill Nye

 

 
REFERENCES:
 
1. https://biologydictionary.net/endosymbiotic-theory/